Promote Democracy – Shoot Self in Foot

I’m sure these conclusions will be questioned but one research paper suggests that democracy has contributed to an increase in global conflict. LINK

There may be some credence to this when one considers the U.S. is a democratic nation and is the leading manufacturer of arms on the planet. There is a correlation made between the numbers of states and cheap weaponry.

There may be a case for nationalism run amok. Certainly in the case of the U.S. that’d be an obvious assertion to make.

It would be nice to think that as humanity grew up a bit and democracy spread, the number of wars would decrease.

Not so, according to research from the University of Warwick and Humboldt University, which shows that we’re actually having more and more.

Between 1870 and 2001, the number of wars between national states rose by an average of two percent a year. Back in 1870, there were just six; by the 1990s, around 36 per year.

And the reasons? Too many new countries and cheaper weaponry, says professor Mark Harrison from the University of Warwick.

“More pairs of countries have clashed because there have been more pairs. This is not reassuring: it shows that there is a close connection between wars and the creation of states and new borders,” he says.

And the other reason, he says, is increasing global prosperity, with economic growth making destructive power cheaper.

In addition, the rise of democracy has actually increased the ability to wage war, because it allows states to tax and borrow more than ever before.

“In other words, the very things that should make politicians less likely to want war – productivity growth, democracy, and trading opportunities – have also made war cheaper,” says Harrison.

“We have more wars, not because we want them, but because we can.”


2 thoughts on “Promote Democracy – Shoot Self in Foot

  1. I do not wish to get too philosophical here, but this was to be expected!

    And it was and is our international corporations building most of the damn weapons!

    The human being is best at war above all the other ‘arts’ for sure.

    1. You’re right Dick. Look at ancient China and their warrior class.

      But were they political? Weren’t they just warriors? I don’t believe they had a major lateral influence on business and wealth creation.

      Weapons manufacture and war today are purely about money and profit. Not about the art of war.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s